Language Matters

“She had a shotgun wedding.”

“She’s living in sin.”

“She’s just his bit on the side.”

One late September Saturday in 1983 around 100 of my grandparents’ friends and family gathered for a 50th wedding anniversary party that my Mum and her siblings had organised. It remained a surprise until the Friday afternoon when my Aunt told my Nan that there was a hair appointment booked for her on the following morning. On hearing the news my Nan broke her heart crying and revealed a secret that she’d kept for 49 years. You see, they hadn’t married in 1933, they’d married in 1934, just six months before their eldest child was born. For almost half a century my grandparents had been lying to their children and friends, hiding the shame of their ‘shotgun wedding.’ In the face of this very public celebration the mask finally crumbled and my Nan confessed that we were celebrating a year early. But she swore that Aunt to secrecy and the rest of her children only found out five years later when their parents died within a few months of each other.

Almost 80 years to the day after that 1934 wedding I was sat in my local pub chatting to a then partner about the news that had come out of his country that day; America’s Supreme Court had allowed same sex marriages to stand in five states meaning for the first time more Americans lived in states where these unions were legal than not. That evening he stated his view that “non monogamy is going to be the next relationship structure to come into the spotlight and upset the status quo.”What makes you say that?” I asked. He argued that people have always gossiped about and judged other people’s relationships and that as each one becomes more socially acceptable (and disparaging the people in them becomes less acceptable) it paves the way for something new to bear the brunt of judgment. “Think about it,” he said. “Having a child out of wedlock used to be the worse thing that could happen, but imagine calling a child a bastard now? And living in sin – you’d never say that these days.” His view was the legalisation of same sex marriage marriage would mean another paradigm shift and the door was now open for non-monogamous couples to out themselves and ‘enjoy’ a period of being the object of fascination and fear.

I can’t really decide whether he was incredibly astute or over simplifying things and bloody lucky in the timing of his statement, but it’s undeniable that in the last five years ethical non-monogamy and polyamory has been enjoying its moment in the spotlight. There’s an increasing amount of coverage in the mainstream media, some of the most popular dating apps have introduced the opportunity to declare your non-monogamous status and more people are coming out about their relationship structures to family and friends. And, as he predicted, there’s backlash.

While it would seem inconceivable in 2019 to make asides about ‘shotgun weddings’ or ‘living in sin’, comments like ‘she’s his bit on the side’ still prevail and they carry the same weight of casual thoughtless judgement. I read something recently where someone talked about poly men “pretending to be enlightened and sex-positive and forward-thinking when really it’s just them wanting to stick their dicks into as many women as possible.” A couple of weeks ago LoveLustLondon tweeted an OKC comment where someone’s blanket message to non-monogamous folk was “don’t even think about messaging me and good luck catching an STD.” Comments like these are not prejudiced on the scale of homophobia or racism, but they are prejudiced nonetheless and can be deeply hurtful to non-monogamous people. And they are lazy. People who make them are invariably lashing out and making no effort to understand or respect the dynamic and hard work that goes into successful open relationships.

Of course, there are some people who are using the increasing profile of non-monogamy and tick boxes on apps to behave in an entirely unethical way. Tech can facilitate in a far more efficient way the same poor behaviour that drunk Saturday nights with mates or late nights at the office used to pave the way for. Humans have always and will always behave like arseholes sometimes. A while back a few of us got involved in a Twitter chat defending poly in light of someone claiming that it’s being evangelised. Exhibit A said at the time: “The pseudo-poly guys and opportunists on dating apps are assholes, but ‘it seems to be all over the media and it’s the evangelical ones who shout loudest’ is exactly what people used to say about homosexuality: “why do they need to shove it down our throats, etc”.

To extrapolate the point Exhibit A made, to those people who make snide comments about poly being trendy or poly people just wanting to fuck everything that walks, I would suggest they replace poly with ‘gay people’ and check whether their comments stand up to scrutiny. If your comments are stigmatising someone and how they are honestly and consensually living their life then you may want to interrogate your attitude rather than their lifestyle.

Last weekend, knowing this post was in the pipeline, I asked Twitter what their experiences were. I could have written this post just sharing people’s responses. I think the one that made me saddest was The Curious Mermaid who said: “The more I read of these tweets, the more I feel that I’m right to still be in the closet about non-mon as far as work acquaintances and parents are concerned.” I hope in time it becomes as acceptable to talk about your different partners without raising eyebrows as it is to now say you’re moving in with someone. I’m unlikely to ever experience the half a century of shame that my Nan did when she became pregnant with her first child, but I also look forward to the day when describing me as someone’s ‘bit on the side’ becomes as unlikely and unacceptable as discussing that someone is living in sin.

This was meant to be posted in time for the fear prompt last week but time ran away with me. Here it is a week late!

Wicked Wednesday... a place to be wickedly sexy or sexily wicked

29 thoughts on “Language Matters

    • …sorry, I’m typing this on my phone and I sent it before I’d finished. Just saying that I’m saddened there has always been so much narrow mindedness down the years. My grandmother was placed in an orphanage because she’d been born ‘out of wedlock’ . Let us hope for a more understanding world.


  1. Conflating poly or non mon with unethical behaviours is lazy thinking in my view. I think that the understanding of the concept of concent is very helpful in gaining clarity about our own and other’s boundaries. We are engaged in unpicking old social structures here though so it will take time!


  2. Thanks for writing this E40, I of course agree with all you say and wonder how many more people like your grandparents are out there (and how many of those are people we know). Well done also for including the caveat that this isn’t on the same scale as racism or homophobia.


    Liked by 1 person

  3. Great post, and yeah your partner was quite astute about poly coming under the spotlight wasn’t he! Sorry if my comment made you sad, too… I’ve had a huge amount of love, understanding and support from my friends and also my sisters, so I’m not feeling totally marginalised or in the closet- don’t feel THAT sad for me :-). I guess I only care a little bit about coming out at work/to my parents anyway. I do think that people in their twenties (I’m in my thirties) seem to be way more confident about owning this shit than I am, so maybe they’ll pave the way for me in my workplace at some point, and then I can piggyback on their coattails. (I realise that’s not a thing and pigs don’t wear coats, but I’m commenting in a hurry!)

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I really enjoyed reading this. Polyamory is not something that I know a lot about and what I do know has really only been learnt since blogging and chatting with people in different sorts of relationship dynamics. I am really glad that the world is slowly changing, although there is still such a lack of understanding and intolerance for those who lead different lifestyles. I think that people feel threatened by other poeple who choose to do things differently to them, as if that somehow challenges what they have themselves. The sooner we stop the need to categorise the better, although I appreciate that it has a psychological purpose. Thank you for a post which made me think about this more deeply 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Brilliant post and it once again made me feel like the world is taking a step back and getting more conservative again, like we need to educate people, but most of all, that we need to tell people to have respect for the choices of others. We are monogamish, allowing other people into our relationship to fuck me, for Master T to touch and play with, but this is our choice and we are hurting no one else with it, right? I feel that as long as you have made a choice to live your life in a certain way and you are not harming others with what you do, people should respect you for your choices. I regret that your grandmother had to live with a secret for so long and at the same time I remember how I was treated when I fell pregnant at 16 in 1983. SO many people turned their backs on me and my father almost died of shame that his teenage daughter was pregnant. I was always a rebel and always chose not to hide it from anyone, despite my father’s attitude, which hugely harmed our relationship. I know, falling pregnant at 16 is not something to be proud of, but deciding to raise her myself deserves a bit of respect. I think in the end all comes down to respect. Respecting people for their choices, whether it would be something you choose for or not.

    Rebel xox

    Liked by 1 person

  6. I’d thought that as humans we’d evolved beyond so many limiting ideas, but in recent years I’ve had to face the fact that we really haven’t. Two steps forward, one big step back. I just hope we start moving forward again and soon! Thanks for sharing! 😉


  7. Great post and it made me think that nothing really is new under the sun – looking back to the heady roman days.
    I agree with one of the comments above in that consent is a vital ingredient and also education. I do not really think people understand non-mon and as with anything that is challenging a person’s world view cognitive dissonance will kick in and the person will fight the attitude that is opposing their ideals. It will take time to change this.
    My Birth mum was put into a mother and baby unit when she fell pregnant with me as a teen. I was taken from her – she was not given a choice – there should have been an uproar over such a thing – but it was “all for the best”…


  8. Pingback: Elust 116 - elust

  9. Pingback: Elust 116 - Exposing40

  10. Pingback: ELust 116 - Love, Violet

  11. Pingback: Elust 116 - Cara Thereon

  12. Pingback: Hands Up for the Elust 116!!! - F DOT LEONORA

  13. Pingback: Elust 116 Erotica and Sex Writing Digest - Tabitha Rayne

  14. Pingback: Elust 116 - Oz Bigdownunder elust sex blog 116 couples

  15. Pingback: Elust #116 - Asrai Devin

  16. Pingback: Elust 116 - submissy

  17. Pingback: e[lust] 116 • The Smutlancer

  18. Pingback: Elust #116 ~ Temperature's Rising

  19. Pingback: Elust 116 – Lascivious Lucy

  20. Pingback: e[lust] #116 | Domme Chronicles

  21. Pingback: Collective blogger positivity: eLust #116 - On Queer Street

  22. Pingback: Elust #116 - Rebel's Notes

  23. Pingback: Whats the Buzz #15 • A to sub-Bee

  24. Pingback: E(lust) 116: Hot times and true | Jerusalem Mortimer: Between the Lines

  25. Pingback: Travel, Privilege, and Solo-Poly - E. L. Byrne Writer

  26. Pingback: Elust 116 ~ Erotically Informative - SEX MATTERS

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.